Criden & Love brought class action against MassMutual on behalf of a class of policyholders who purchased MassMutual annuities due to MassMutual’s failure to pay minimum guaranteed interest; Trial on March 12, 2020 – awaiting verdict.
Some of the cases we are currently working on are listed below. If you believe your have been a victim of a corporate fraud, please contact us for a free consultation.
Aronstein v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. (D. Mass)
Breakwater Trading v. JPMorgan Chase (S.D.N.Y.)
Criden & Love serves as Class Counsel in class action against bank, alleging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act, based on bank’s manipulation of Treasury Futures (spoofing); pending.
Hernandez v. Florida Department of Revenue (Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County, Florida)
Criden & Love brought class action against the Florida Department of Revenue for illegally collecting taxes on mortgages written by federal and state credit unions; pending.
In Re: Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litigation (M.D. Fla.)
Criden & Love serves as Class Counsel on behalf of consumers who made retail purchases of disposable contact lenses, alleging that certain manufacturers conspired to impose minimum resale prices; pending.
In re: Foreign Exchange Antitrust Litigation (S.D.N.Y.)
Criden & Love serves as Class Counsel on behalf of investors who entered into FX instruments, alleging that certain banks conspired to fix FX Benchmark Rates; 15 settlements for $2,310,275,000; claims against other banks pending.
Result: $2,310,275,000
In re: Juul Labs, Inc. Marketing Sales Practices (N.D. Cal.)
Criden and Love serves as Class Counsel on behalf of victims of JUUL’s wrongful conduct in marketing JUUL e-cigarette devices; pending.
In re: Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation (S.D.N.Y.)
Criden & Love serves as Class Counsel of exchange-based investors in futures, swaps, and other Libor-based derivative products, alleging that certain banks manipulated Libor rates; settled with majority of banks for $180 million; case continues against non-settling banks.
Result: $180,000,000
In re: Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation (E.D.N.Y.)
Criden & Love serves as Class Counsel representing merchants (only for injunctive relief) against Visa and MasterCard for conspiring to use market restraints to keep interchange fees artificially high.
In re: Wawa Inc., Data Security Litigation (E.D. Pa.)
Criden & Love serves as Class Counsel against Wawa in action based on company’s failure to protect the confidential information of millions of its customers; pending.
Litovich v. Bank of America, et al. (S.D.N.Y.)
Criden & Love serves as Class Counsel against major banks for fixing the price of corporate bonds in the secondary market; pending.
Weatherly v. Pershing LLC (N.D. Texas)
Criden & Love brought numerous actions on behalf of investors of the R. Allen Stanford Ponzi Scheme; pending.