Some of the cases we are currently working on are listed below.
If you believe your have been a victim of a corporate fraud, please contact us for a free consultation.
Sample Cases
September 25, 2019
Aronstein v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. (D. Mass)
Criden & Love brought class action against MassMutual on behalf of a class of policyholders who purchased MassMutual annuities due to MassMutual’s failure to pay minimum guaranteed interest; Trial on March 12, 2020 – awaiting verdict.
July 28, 2020
Breakwater Trading v. JPMorgan Chase (S.D.N.Y.)
Criden & Love serves as Class Counsel in class action against bank, alleging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act, based on bank’s manipulation of Treasury Futures (spoofing); pending.
October 10, 2019
Hernandez v. Florida Department of Revenue (Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County, Florida)
Criden & Love brought class action against the Florida Department of Revenue for illegally collecting taxes on mortgages written by federal and state credit unions; pending.
October 10, 2019
In Re: Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litigation (M.D. Fla.)
Criden & Love serves as Class Counsel on behalf of consumers who made retail purchases of disposable contact lenses, alleging that certain manufacturers conspired to impose minimum resale prices; pending.
October 10, 2019
In re: Foreign Exchange Antitrust Litigation (S.D.N.Y.)
Criden & Love serves as Class Counsel on behalf of investors who entered into FX instruments, alleging that certain banks conspired to fix FX Benchmark Rates; 15 settlements for $2,310,275,000; claims against other banks pending.
July 28, 2020
In re: Juul Labs, Inc. Marketing Sales Practices (N.D. Cal.)
Criden and Love serves as Class Counsel on behalf of victims of JUUL’s wrongful conduct in marketing JUUL e-cigarette devices; pending.
October 10, 2019
In re: Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation (S.D.N.Y.)
Criden & Love serves as Class Counsel of exchange-based investors in futures, swaps, and other Libor-based derivative products, alleging that certain banks manipulated Libor rates; settled with majority of banks for $180 million; case continues against non-settling banks.
October 10, 2019
In re: Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation (E.D.N.Y.)
Criden & Love serves as Class Counsel representing merchants (only for injunctive relief) against Visa and MasterCard for conspiring to use market restraints to keep interchange fees artificially high.
July 28, 2020
In re: Wawa Inc., Data Security Litigation (E.D. Pa.)
Criden & Love serves as Class Counsel against Wawa in action based on company’s failure to protect the confidential information of millions of its customers; pending.
July 28, 2020
Litovich v. Bank of America, et al. (S.D.N.Y.)
Criden & Love serves as Class Counsel against major banks for fixing the price of corporate bonds in the secondary market; pending.
October 10, 2019
Weatherly v. Pershing LLC (N.D. Texas)
Criden & Love brought numerous actions on behalf of investors of the R. Allen Stanford Ponzi Scheme; pending.